Powered by Blogger.

Search Google

Friday, October 26, 2007

Genarlow Wilson

The AfroSpear is delighted, Genarlow Wilson is Freed and Justice Is Served

Jill at Jack and Jill Politics says it better than I can, "I mean, seriouly speaking, can you even imagine the long arm of the law locking up a white under-18 teenager who got a consenting blowjob from another teenager separated by only 1-2 grades in school? There would be a whole lot of white kids in jail right this minute, fo' sho'! Come on now. Let's get real." Read More HERE

FREE AT LAST! Said Eddie Griffin, While the Village
is Celebrating. Check out what some of the thousands of African American bloggers are saying Angry Black Bitch, Mirror On America , What About Our Daughters , Black Parent Movement , Stereohyped, Black Perspectives.net , 3 Brothers and a Sister , Dr. Marc Lamont Hill, My Urban Report , Black Informant , Prometheus 6 , Let's Talk Honestly (LTH) ,Exodus Mentality and many many more.

Welcome Home Brother Wilson. Do some good things with your new opportunity.

Do Black Boycotts Work in 2007

Super Spade has asked a very important question. Do “Black”-outs work?

Cross-posted at the Brave New Films Blog.

Money Fist

Activist and Radio Talk Show Host Warren Ballentine has called for a Black out on Friday, Nov. 2nd. This is in response to, among other things, the domestic torture of Megan Williams, and the Jena 6.



I agree, these types of efforts although noteworthy, gain limited traction because there are no specific, targeted, activities for specific segments of black communities to be involved, over a specific period of time.

Black communities are not there yet, regarding national Black Outs and boycotts. If black folks did not organize after a whole city “New Orleans” of black folks were displaced by Federal government in-action (check out the difference in the treatment of folks in San Diego vs New Orleans - Compare the smooth evacuation of 1000000 people in San Diego to the non evacuation of far less people in New Orleans in 2005.

why should we think blacks are going to organize around 2-3 dozen nooses and the gang rape of a young black women from WV?

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Condi Security?

No security for a sister? I guess Condi needs Blackwater to protect her in the states? It's about time someone confronted her.

"An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

(Photograph by Charles Dharapak of Associated Press.)

Code Pink protester Desiree Farooz confronts Condoleeza Rice with “blood-stained” hands, calling the Secretary of State a “war criminal” who should be tried at the Hague.
Hat Tip Crooks and Liars for the photo link.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Megan Williams Speaks Out! Torture Victim Wants Abusers to "Fry"

Can a black woman get Justice in West Virginia?

Click her picture to see video. What do you think? can she get justice?

(AP Photo/Jeff Gentner)

W.Va. Woman Speaks About Torture Ordeal

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Megan Williams thought she was going to a party. That's why she tagged along with a woman she hardly knew, up a remote southern West Virginia hollow to a run-down trailer surrounded by beer cans and broken-down furniture.

"But there wasn't no party," Williams said. "I realized I'd made a bad mistake."

For at least a week, authorities say, the 20-year-old black woman was kept captive in a shed, tortured, beaten, forced to eat rat, dog and human feces, and raped by six white men and women who taunted her with racial slurs.

"They just kept saying 'This is what we do to niggers down here,'" Williams told The Associated Press in one of her most extensive interviews since the shocking case made national headlines last month.

Seated in a rocking chair in her mother's living room, about 50 miles from that shed, the slight woman with cocoa-colored skin says she was hopelessly outnumbered by people who just wanted to hurt a black person.

"I just hope they fry for what they did to me. That's really all I got to say," she said. "I hope they fry."

West Virginia does not have a death penalty, but the six suspects could spend the rest of their lives in prison if convicted of rape and kidnapping charges.

Still, Williams and her family want more. They want the case prosecuted as a hate crime, something authorities have so far stopped short of doing. More HERE

Hillary Clinton “hillary clinton: LYNCHIN'”

AAPP: Look Out Hillary, you and your husbands words and your actions are coming at you. Don't think you can take the black vote, by talking black and saying nothing. Black folks may say they are voting for you, but when they get in the voting both, something just might tell them to vote 'Black" and give a Brotha a chance.

Check out the Video (Click on picture above) Hat Tip to Mia T!

hillary clinton: LYNCHIN'

by Mia T, 10.19.07

"It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important." (Martin Luther King)

Ironically, the logic of this pronouncement by Martin Luther King would, in short order, be refuted by the reality of his own lynching. King's hope was misplaced and his reasoning was circular. The resultant rule of law relied on by King presumed an adherence to the rule of law in the first instance.

Adherence to the rule of law is not something normally associated with the clintons. Moreover, racial and ethnic disrespect, intimidation, exploitation and hate have always been a fundamental clinton tactic and the reflexive use the "N"-word and other racial and ethnic slurs, an essential element in the clinton lexicon. When the "first black president" and his wife ran Arkansas, the NAACP sued them for intimidating black voters at the polls.

Conversely, the clintons' refinement of the DNC drag and drop is, arguably, one of the more insidious and repugnant applications of their special brand of race-hate politics.

Calculating a black man's worth to be 5/3 of a vote is no less racist, and arguably more so, than calculating his worth to be 3/5 of a white man; the latter is demeaning, but the former is dehumanizing.

But it is even worse.

Listen to Randall Robinson in this video, read below about Rwanda.

Only one conclusion is possible: A clinton legacy of lynching.

"This month marks 10 years since the advent of the Rwandan genocide, a cruel, violent and well-organized rampage that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children and the total disruption of Rwandan society. Over the past decade, scholars and advocates have rightly reflected on the reasons that the international community and nations in Africa must share the responsibility for this tragedy. As I said during my trip to Rwanda in 1998, "We did not act quickly enough after the killing began. We should not have allowed the refugee camps to become safe haven for the killers. We did not immediately call these crimes by their rightful name: genocide."
bill clinton
LearnFrom Rwanda
The Washington Post
Tuesday, April 6, 2004; Page A21

Note: clinton's use of "we" is consistent with his "buck stops there/everywhere but not here" policy.

"Bill Clinton felt their pain. Retrospectively. In 1998, on his Grand Apology Tour of Africa, a whirlwind tour of whirlwind apologies for slavery, the Cold War, you name it, he touched down in Kigali and apologized for the Rwandan genocide. "When you look at those children who greeted us," he said, biting his lip, as is his wont, "how could anyone say they did not want those children to have a chance to have their own children?"

Alas, the President had precisely identified the problem. In April 1994, when the Hutu genocidaires looked at the children who greeted them in the Tutsi villages, that's exactly what they thought: they didn't want those Tutsi children to have a chance to have their own children. So the question is: when a bunch of killers refuse to subscribe to multiculti mumbo-jumbo, what do you do?

'All over the world there were people like me sitting in offices,' continued Bill in his apology aria, 'who did not fully appreciate the depth and the speed with which you were being engulfed by this unimaginable terror.'

Au contraire, he appreciated it all too fully. That's why, during the bloodbath, Clinton Administration officials were specifically instructed not to use the word "genocide" lest it provoke public pressure to do something. Documents made public last week confirm that US officials knew within the first few days that a 'final solution' to eliminate all Tutsis was underway."

"In the course of a hundred days in 1994 the Hutu government of Rwanda and its extremist allies very nearly succeeded in exterminating the country's Tutsi minority. Using firearms, machetes, and a variety of garden implements, Hutu militiamen, soldiers, and ordinary citizens murdered some 800,000 Tutsi and politically moderate Hutu. It was the fastest, most efficient killing spree of the twentieth century.

A few years later, in a series in The New Yorker, Philip Gourevitch recounted in horrific detail the story of the genocide and the world's failure to stop it. President Bill Clinton, a famously avid reader, expressed shock. He sent copies of Gourevitch's articles to his second-term national-security adviser, Sandy Berger. The articles bore confused, angry, searching queries in the margins. 'Is what he's saying true?' Clinton wrote with a thick black felt-tip pen beside heavily underlined paragraphs. 'How did this happen?' he asked, adding, 'I want to get to the bottom of this.' The President's urgency and outrage were oddly timed. As the terror in Rwanda had unfolded, Clinton had shown virtually no interest in stopping the genocide, and his Administration had stood by as the death toll rose into the hundreds of thousands.....

In March of 1998, on a visit to Rwanda, President Clinton issued what would later be known as the 'Clinton apology,' which was actually a carefully hedged acknowledgment. He spoke to the crowd assembled on the tarmac at Kigali Airport: 'We come here today partly in recognition of the fact that we in the United States and the world community did not do as much as we could have and should have done to try to limit what occurred' in Rwanda.

This implied that the United States had done a good deal but not quite enough. In reality the United States did much more than fail to send troops. It led a successful effort to remove most of the UN peacekeepers who were already in Rwanda. It aggressively worked to block the subsequent authorization of UN reinforcements. It refused to use its technology to jam radio broadcasts that were a crucial instrument in the coordination and perpetuation of the genocide. And even as, on average, 8,000 Rwandans were being butchered each day, U.S. officials shunned the term "genocide," for fear of being obliged to act. The United States in fact did virtually nothing "to try to limit what occurred." Indeed, staying out of Rwanda was an explicit U.S. policy objective.

With the grace of one grown practiced at public remorse, the President gripped the lectern with both hands and looked across the dais at the Rwandan officials and survivors who surrounded him. Making eye contact and shaking his head, he explained, 'It may seem strange to you here, especially the many of you who lost members of your family, but all over the world there were people like me sitting in offices, day after day after day, who did not fully appreciate [pause] the depth [pause] and the speed [pause] with which you were being engulfed by this unimaginable terror.'

Clinton chose his words with characteristic care. It was true that although top U.S. officials could not help knowing the basic facts--thousands of Rwandans were dying every day--that were being reported in the morning papers, many did not 'fully appreciate' the meaning. In the first three weeks of the genocide the most influential American policymakers portrayed (and, they insist, perceived) the deaths not as atrocities or the components and symptoms of genocide but as wartime 'casualties'--the deaths of combatants or those caught between them in a civil war.

Yet this formulation avoids the critical issue of whether Clinton and his close advisers might reasonably have been expected to 'fully appreciate' the true dimensions and nature of the massacres. During the first three days of the killings U.S. diplomats in Rwanda reported back to Washington that well-armed extremists were intent on eliminating the Tutsi. And the American press spoke of the door-to-door hunting of unarmed civilians. By the end of the second week informed nongovernmental groups had already begun to call on the Administration to use the term 'genocide,' causing diplomats and lawyers at the State Department to begin debating the word's applicability soon thereafter. In order not to appreciate that genocide or something close to it was under way, U.S. officials had to ignore public reports and internal intelligence and debate.

...[W]hatever their convictions about 'never again,' many of them did sit around, and they most certainly did allow genocide to happen. In examining how and why the United States failed Rwanda, we see that without strong leadership the system will incline toward risk-averse policy choices."
Samantha Power
Bystanders to Genocide
Why the United States Let the Rwandan Tragedy Happen

The author's exclusive interviews with scores of the participants in the decision-making, together with her analysis of newly declassified documents, yield a chilling narrative of self-serving caution and flaccid will and countless missed opportunities to mitigate a colossal crime
The Atlantic Online


"When you look at the way the House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation, and you know what I'm talkin' about. (hillary clinton)

Miss hillary's 'plantation' metaphor, ostensibly about the Rs, is really about Katrina and New Orleans and the Ds.

Like the parting of the Red Sea, Katrina let an enslaved people go. Katrina opened the eyes of the poor--mostly black--underclass, the Left's absolutely essential--and until now, captive--constituency.

The clintons and the Left are terrified that these poor people will finally see what has been before them for 60 years: Not only a failed idea, but a party whose power depends on perpetuating that failure.

The clintons and the Left are terrified that these people will finally see the modern Democratic party for what it is: a bunch of bitter, moribund, power-hungry elistists whose very existence depends keeping them dirt poor, disinformed and dependent....

This, in contrast to the Republican party whose power depends on their education, success and self-sufficiency.

Indeed, the people are seeing.

Why do you suppose the clintons and Landrieu-through Mayor ('chocolate New Orleans') Nagin--tried to get their voters back, post haste (no trouble bussing 'em straightaway and en masse when it's to the polls)--to a still toxic morgue with no potable water, no emergency support and with renewed risk of deluge?

Why do you suppose the diaspora looks to be permanent? Pre-Katrina New Orleans was 67 percent black. Post-Katrina is only 46.

Indeed, the people are seeing.


vandals tie a noose around the neck of the bronze statue of Tupac Shakur (2Pac)

Hat Tip: ThugLifeArmy

The Tupac Amaru Shakur Foundation (TASF) regrets to report that a series of attacks have taken place at the Tupac Amaru Shakur Center for the Arts, 5616 Memorial Drive, Stone Mountain, Georgia. The first incident occurred in the early hours of Saturday, October 20th, when vandals defaced the building as well as tying a noose around the neck of the bronze statue of Tupac Shakur (2Pac) located in the Center’s Peace Garden. The attacks are being investigated as hate crimes by the De Kalb County Sheriff’s Office. The second incident occurred at the Center at 2:00AM Monday morning when the statue was damaged further. A male has been arrested and is currently being held in custody. More HERE

The Blogging Against Genocide Day

Today I am Blogging Against Genocide. Joining with Afrospear member D. Yobachi Boswell of Black Prespective,net, Eddie Griffin BASG, Electronic Village and dozens of other Afrospear bloggers and Amnesty International for a Day of Action for Darfur.

Brother Yobachi, thank you for bring us together on this important matter.

Today the Afrosphere Jena 6 Coalition is morphing into the Afrosphere Darfur Action Coalition to Blog Against Genocide, aiming to raise public awareness of this atrocity and applying public pressure to politicians.

Let me be honest

As an African American blogger this post has a two prong purpose, to educate myself about what is going on in Darfur, and to educate those who would read this blog post. OK, let start with what I know about Darfur. Pretty much nothing. I know Darfur is in a part of Africa and people are dying that's it. No real understanding of the players and politics with Darfur, although I have been following the lack of Federal government response to this genocide in Darfur. I probably know just as much as the "average" black American knows, or for that matter the average American. Am I ashamed of myself? -0f course. I should know what goes on around me. Who is at fault for me not knowing? Just Me. I am guilty of being preoccupied with what goes on in America and the war in Iraq, that I have not educated myself about what is going on in Darfur. Well that changes today. Let me get and give a little Darfur 101.

It's Time to Learn

Roots Of The Crisis

Source: enoughproject.org Darfur is only the latest killing field in Sudan, where leaders driven by racism, greed, and extremist ideology have exploited the country's diversity as a weapon to divide and conquer its people. Understanding the history of this crisis is essential to stopping it.

Sudan, Africa's largest country, owes its existence as one unit to its colonial history. Sudan is divided by religion, ethnicity, tribe and economic livelihood (between nomadic and sedentary cultures). Since independence in 1956, the country's most significant conflict has been that between the north and south, with the first civil war lasting from 1955-1972, and the second from 1983-2005. More HERE

Since early 2003, Sudanese government soldiers and their proxy militia, known as the Janjaweed, have fought rebel groups in the western region of Darfur. Initially, the government strategy largely involved systematic assaults against civilians from the same ethnic groups as the rebel forces. The targeted victims have been mostly from the Fur, Zaghawa, and Masaalit ethnic groups.

Hundreds of thousands of civilians have died from violence, disease, and starvation, and thousands of women have been raped. More than 2.5 million civilians have been driven from their homes, their villages torched and property stolen. Thousands of villages have been systematically destroyed and more than 230,000 people have fled to neighboring Chad. But most of those displaced are trapped inside Darfur. Although large-scale government attacks against civilians have declined since 2005, millions remain at risk. Most of the displaced are not returning home for fear that their villages will be attacked again. The Sudanese government still bears primary responsibility for the danger to civilians, but the increasing fragmentation of the rebel groups and their use of violence have contributed to the high level of insecurity.

Darfur is home to more than 30 ethnic groups, all of which are Muslim. The Janjaweed militias recruited, armed, trained, and supported by the Sudanese government are drawn from several of the groups in Darfur who identify themselves as Arab. They have used racial slurs while attacking and raping the targeted groups, who are considered non-Arab. The ethnic and perceived racial basis of the violence has been well documented by the U.S. Department of State, the United Nations, independent human rights organizations, and international journalists.

The Khartoum-based government's use of ethnically and racially targeted violence in Darfur resembles similar actions in southern Sudan before a tenuous 2005 peace agreement ended conflict there. Government-sponsored actions in both regions have included:

  • INFLAMING ethnic conflict

  • IMPEDING international humanitarian access, resulting in deadly conditions of life for displaced civilians

  • BOMBING civilians from aircraft

  • MURDERING and RAPING civilians

Because of substantial evidence that "acts of genocide or related crimes against humanity were occurring or immediately threatened," in 2004 the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum declared a Genocide Emergency for Darfur. That same year, the U.S. government determined that genocide had been committed in Darfur. In January 2005, the UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that "crimes against humanity and war crimes have been committed in Darfur and may be no less serious and heinous then genocide." More HERE

Update 2007 - Current Situation

Efforts are underway to deploy a hybrid UN-African Union peacekeeping force of 26,000 to replace the poorly equipped and overextended 7,000 AU troops now on the ground. On September 30 hundreds of rebels raided an AU peacekeeping base in Haskanita, killing at least ten soldiers and kidnapping dozens more. Aid officials are concerned that these attacks will discourage UN member nations from committing troops to the new hybrid force.

The UN and the AU are convening peace talks on October 27 in Tripoli, Libya. Key rebel leaders are refusing to participate, and the good faith of Khartoum remains under scrutiny.

6 Things we can do to respond to this genocide:

1. JOIN OUR COMMUNITY OF CONSCIENCE. Sign up for our Genocide Prevention e-Newsletter and subscribe to the Voices on Genocide Prevention podcast and blog. Find out more about genocide, the current situation in Darfur, and other places at risk.

2. CONTACT THE MEDIA. Tell them you want better coverage of Darfur. Visit their Web sites, call them, and send e-mails providing feedback on their coverage of the region.

3. COMMUNICATE WITH DECISION MAKERS about the need to provide humanitarian assistance, protect civilians, stop the violence, and promote a solution to end the genocide in Darfur.

4. GET ENGAGED IN YOUR COMMUNITY. Talk about Darfur with your friends, family, members of organizations you belong to, and coworkershelp spread the word. Schools, churches, synagogues, mosques, and groups across the country are making a difference.

5. SUPPORT EDUCATION AND RELIEF EFFORTS. Support the ongoing efforts of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum to draw attention to what is happening in Darfur. Find out more about who is on the ground in Darfur, what they are doing, and how you can help.

Send our print this Blog Post. Pass this blog post on to someone you know who knows very little or nothing about Darfur. EDUCATE!

Other things you can do:

Take More Action Divest!

Learn more through the links to organizations who are addressing Darfur Genocide:



Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Why are black men like John Lewis going for Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama.

AAPP: It looks like the Clinton-Obama Battle for Black Voters is Heating Up. The fact of the matter is (black) civil rights icon John Lewis chose Hillary Clinton (a white women) over Barack Obama (a Black Man). It looks like its going to be a real hot race for black votes in Election 2008. Why are so many black men going over to the Hillary Clinton camp? I wonder if anyone has done an analysis of how many black male pol's have endorsed Hillary Vs how many black female pol's have endorsed Obama? Is there a sex divide?

Check out the NPR report on how the Clinton-Obama Battle for Black Voters is heating up.

Listen to this story... by

All Things Considered, October 23, 2007 · Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama hope to win the African-American vote in the Democratic presidential primaries.

One key is winning high-profile endorsements. Clinton got one of those earlier this month when the civil rights icon John Lewis chose her over Obama. He waited a long time to make his decision known.

What does the endorsement mean for Clinton's campaign?

Check out other related NPR Stories

Check Out Bloggers' Roundtable

Bloggers' Roundtable: Nas' Album Title

Listen to this story...

News & Notes, October 22, 2007 · Hot topics in the blogosphere include the controversial title of rapper Nas' new album and Glamour magazine's take on black women and natural hair.

Roundtable guests included Christopher Rabb of Afro-Netizen, Patrice Yursik of Afrobella, and John McCann of Book of John.

Gays and Lesbians

Ending Employment Discrimination Against Gays and Lesbians
Source Tip:
american progress action.org

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), introduced by Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), would make it illegal to fire, refuse to hire, or fail to promote employees simply based on sexual orientation. While the vast majority -- nearly 90 percent -- of Fortune 500 companies prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, there are surprisingly no federal prohibitions against such discriminatory behavior. On Wednesday, the House is expected to vote on this legislation, ensuring for the first time ever that gay and lesbian employees are afforded this critical federal protection. The ENDA legislation originally included all members of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) community, but lawmakers removed gender identity from the bill because it did not have the requisite support in the House to pass. "We do not have the votes to pass the bill with transgender" protections, said Frank. The relevant choice now facing progressives "is not between a limited ENDA and a comprehensive ENDA. It's a choice between a limited ENDA and no ENDA." Dale Carpenter of the Independent Gay Forum writes in support of passing a limited bill: "It's hard to see how [ENDA] serves any principle at all if it can't be enacted." Indeed, while passing legislation that prohibits only discrimination based on sexual orientation may not be the perfect strategy, it will likely hasten -- and be a critical predicate for -- legislation that protects the entire LGBT community over time. Urge your senators to support ENDA here.

AT&T and Verizon Donate To get Rockfeller Vote

New York Times — Executives at the two biggest phone companies contributed more than $42,000 in political donations to Senator John D. Rockefeller IV this year while seeking his support for legal immunity for businesses participating in National Security Agency eavesdropping.

The surge in contributions came from a Who’s Who of executives at the companies, AT&T and Verizon, starting with the chief executives and including at least 50 executives and lawyers at the two utilities, according to campaign finance reports.

The money came primarily from a fund-raiser that Verizon held for Mr. Rockefeller in March in New York and another that AT&T sponsored for him in May in San Antonio.

Mr. Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, emerged last week as the most important supporter of immunity in devising a compromise plan with Senate Republicans and the Bush administration.

A measure approved by the intelligence panel on Thursday would add restrictions on the eavesdropping and extend retroactive immunity to carriers that participated in it. President Bush secretly approved the program after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mr. Rockefeller’s office said Monday that the sharp increases in contributions from the telecommunications executives had no influence on his support for the immunity provision.



Monday, October 22, 2007

Breaking News: American media companies file a 1st Amendment petition seeking to open to public scrutiny the criminal trial of Jena 6 defendent

HOUSTON - A coalition of major American media companies filed a 1st Amendment petition Monday seeking to open to public scrutiny the criminal trial of Mychal Bell, one of the teenage defendants in the controversial Jena 6 case in Louisiana.

The legal motion challenges the decisions by presiding LaSalle Parish District Judge J.P. Mauffray to close the proceedings in Bell's juvenile case and order all the parties involved not to speak about it. Mauffray's orders run counter to Louisiana juvenile laws, precedents set by the Louisiana Supreme Court and provisions of both the Louisiana and U.S. Constitutions, the petition asserts.

The Chicago Tribune is the lead plaintiff in the petition, which has been joined by the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times Co., the Associated Press, the Hearst Corp., the Belo Corp.,
the Gannett Corp., CNN and ABC News.


Sunday, October 21, 2007

African American Opinion Nominated For Award

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger2/5911/823652241229751/1600/z/599211/gse_multipart35616.png” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
has been nominated for

The image “http://www.blackwebawards.com/2008/images/stories/bwa%20logos/160%20BANNER.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.


These Nominees speak regularly on topics relevant to the Black community - and they do it well.

The Nominees are:



Vote for African American Opinion HERE!

African American Political Pundit Coming to YouTube

Search This Blog

Contact Your Elected Representative

African American Pundit encourages you to contact your elected officials/representatives and share your thoughts on current events and government policy. All politics is local!

Below you'll find links to e-mail and postal addresses, and phone numbers for key elected officials.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP