Friday, April 4, 2008

Martin luther King, John McCain and The Hate McCain Cannot Hide

AAPP: There was no "Heart or Soul" in John McCain's recent speech on Martin Luther King, Jr. It really was not John McCain's words. John McCain words and deeds were truly spoken when he voted against Martin Luther King's Birthday becoming a national holiday.


Here is the real record of John McCain:



John McCain has said he championed establishing a holiday in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and that he is "very proud" of his record. But the truth is, McCain has a long record of opposing the holiday.

In fact, in 1983 McCain did something not even Dick Cheney did: he voted in Congress against a federal holiday in honor of Dr. King, which President Reagan later signed into law. In 1987, McCain supported Arizona Governor Evan Mecham's action to rescind an executive order establishing a state holiday in Martin Luther King's honor.

Even in 1989, when McCain finally came around and supported a state holiday, he said he was "still opposed to another federal holiday." As recently as 2000, McCain reportedly said he "resented it when people outside of Arizona got involved" in the issue. [FOXNews.com, 4/3/08; ABC News, 4/3/08; Huffington Post, 4/1/08; Wall Street Journal, 4/3/08; AP, 2/29/00]

McCain apparently thinks a stop in Memphis can gloss over that part of his bio, but -- as one reporter noted -- McCain's "views on race in the 1980s do not stand up to the sunlight of America a quarter-century later." [ABC News, 4/3/08]

1983: McCain Votes Against Federal MLK Day. In 1983 McCain voted against establishing a federal holiday in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King. "Most Republicans in the House voted for the holiday (89 voted for the holiday, 77 opposed), though all three Arizona House Republicans were opposed. Reps. Dick Cheney, R-Wyoming, and Newt Gingrich, R-Georgia, voted for the holiday. (Cheney had voted against it in 1978.)" [ABC News, 4/3/08]

1987: McCain Opposes Arizona MLK Holiday. In Arizona, Democratic governor Bruce Babbitt issued an executive order to establish an MLK holiday. Yet "[i]n January 1987, the first act of Arizona's new governor, Republican Evan Mecham, was to rescind the executive order by his predecessor to create an MLK holiday. Arizona's stance became a national controversy. McCain backed the decision at the time." [ABC News, 4/3/08]

1989: McCain Still Opposes Federal Holiday. Even though he now supported establishing a state holiday for Martin Luther King, he said he "said he was 'still opposed to another federal holiday.'" [Huffington Post, 4/1/08]

2000: McCain Said He Had Opposed Instituting MLK Day On A National Level. In 2000, it was reported that "McCain has said he supported implementing the holiday on a state level but resented it when people outside of Arizona got involved." [Associated Press, 2/29/2000]

After casting himself as a "Maverick" in 2000, the new John McCain is walking in lockstep with President Bush, pandering to the right wing of the Republican Party, and embracing the ideology he once denounced. On the campaign trail McCain has callously abandoned many of his previously held positions, even contradicted himself, in a blatant attempt to remake himself into a candidate Republicans can accept in 2008. So just who is the real John McCain? The Democratic National Committee will present a daily fact aimed at exposing the man behind the myth.



CNN: Got it Wrong Again, the fact of the matter is John McCain was jeered and booed, not approved. One person yelled "we all make mistakes" probably a McCain campaign worker. The people who were shaking his hand were also probably McCain Campaign Workers.

Now get this, as reported by Atlantic.com John McCain's remarks to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference here on the 40th anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King were written by his campaign's newest hire, Matthew Scully, the former White House speechwriter and essayist.

"It's just a lovely piece of writing," said Mark Salter, McCain's senior strategist and principle speechwriter. "Just right out of the box, he really gets John in his first speech."

McCain's words are mostly about Dr. King. But then there is this paragraph of contrition:

Sometimes the most radical thing is to be confronted with our own standards -- to be asked simply that we live up to the principles we profess. Even in this most idealistic of nations, we do not always take kindly to being reminded of what more we can do, or how much better we can be, or who else can be included in the promise of America. We can be slow as well to give greatness its due, a mistake I made myself long ago when I voted against a federal holiday in memory of Dr. King. I was wrong and eventually realized that, in time to give full support for a state holiday in Arizona. We can all be a little late sometimes in doing the right thing, and Dr. King understood this about his fellow Americans. But he knew as well that in the long term, confidence in the reasonability and good heart of America is always well placed. And always, that was his method in word and action -- to remind us of who we are and what we believe. His arguments were unanswerable and they were familiar, the case always resting on the writings of the Founders, the teachings of the prophets, and the Word of the Lord.

The invitation from the SCLC was extended last week, and the campaign eagerly accepted. They are just as eager to want to rebut the conventional wisdom that McCain has no chance of wresting more than a tenth of the black vote away from Barack Obama; maybe the results will be futile in November, but there will be plenty of campaign trips to places that Republicans don't normally campaign. (There is also, as always, the subtle messages that are sent to race-conscious moderate whites.)

McCain sees King's life of one of service to America.; Coincidentally, the name of McCain's biographical tour is "Service to America."

Here is how McCain ends his speech:



And yet for all of this, forty years and a world away, we look up to that balcony, we remember that night, and we are still left with a feeling of loss. Here was a young man who composed one of literature's finest testimonies to the yearning for equality and justice under law -- writing on the margins of a newspaper, in the confinement of a prison cell. Here was a preacher who endured beatings, survived bombings, suffered knifings, abuse, and ridicule, and still placed his trust in the Prince of Peace. Here was a husband and father who will stand to children in every generation as a model of Christian manhood, but never got to raise his own sons and daughters, or to share in the gift of years with his good wife.

All of this was lost on the fourth of April, 1968, and there are no consolations to balance the scale. What remains, however, is the example and witness of The Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., and that is forever.


AAPP: One speech cannot erase hatred towards Martin Luther King or his dream of equality. Great job Matthew Scully you tried. What are your thoughts?

6 comments:

msladydeborah said...

It is a nicely written speech and it does bring up McCain's decision not to support having a feceral holiday in honor of MLK.

But can a lepoard change his spots?

There is no reason to believe that McCain is any more interested in AA's opinions about now then he was during that particular period of time.

msladydeborah said...

I forgot to give you kudos for the video! You know I love political humour!

Can you explain about the AAPP widget that is stalking visitors up and down your page? ;-}

Anonymous said...

Black Guy Asks Nation For Change
(Shit, damn,...that's WHACK!!)
March 19, 2008 | Issue 44•12

CHICAGO—According to witnesses, a loud black man approached a crowd of some 4,000 strangers in downtown Chicago Tuesday and made repeated demands for change.

“The time for change is now,” said the black guy, yelling at everyone within earshot for 20 straight minutes, practically begging America for change. “The need for change is stronger and more urgent than ever before. And only you—the people standing here today, and indeed all the people of this great nation—only you can deliver this change.”
Enlarge Image Black Guy

The black guy is oddly comfortable demanding change from people he’s never even met.

It is estimated that, to date, the black man has asked every single person in the United States for change.

“I’ve already seen this guy four times today,” Chicago-area ad salesman Blake Gordon said. “Every time, it’s the same exact spiel. ‘I need change.’ ‘I want change.’ Why’s he so eager for all this change? What’s he going to do with it, anyway?”

After his initial requests for change, the black man rambled nonstop on a variety of unrelated topics, calling for affordable health care, demanding that the government immediately begin withdrawing troops from Iraq, and proposing a $75 billion economic stimulus plan to create new jobs.

“What a wacko,” Schaumburg, IL resident Patrick Morledge said. “And, of course, after telling us all about how he had the ability to magically fix everything, he went right back to asking for change. Typical.”

“If he’s really looking for change, he’s got the wrong guy,” Morledge added.

Reports indicate that the black man has been riding from city to city across the country, asking for change wherever he goes. Citizens in Austin, TX said they spotted the same guy standing on the street Friday, shouting far-fetched ideas about global warming. Cleveland residents also reported seeing him in a local park, wildly gesticulating and quoting from the Bible. And last week, patrons at the Starlight Diner in Cheyenne, WY claimed that the black man accosted them while they were eating, repeatedly requesting change.

“I saw him walk in and I knew he was headed straight for our table,” said mother of three Gladys Davies. “He just stood there smiling at us for a while, and asked how our food tasted. Then he went and did the same thing at the next table over. The nerve of some people.”

Those who encountered the black man Tuesday said he engaged in erratic behavior, including pointing at random people in the crowd and desperately saying he needs their help, going up to complete strangers and hugging them, and angrily claiming that he is not looking for just a little bit of change, but rather a great deal of change, and that he wants it “right now.”

“I’ll be honest, when that black guy said he would ’stop at nothing’ to get change, it kind of scared me,” local mechanic Phil Nighbert said. “Just leave me alone.”

Though many were taken aback by the black man’s brazen demands, some, such as Jackson, MS’s Holly Moser, sympathized with him. She gave the black man credit for boldly standing up and asking every last person around him for change.

“I told him I’d give him some if I saw him later, even though I probably won’t,” Moser said. “Very nice man, though.”

Most, however, ignored his requests.

“I’m a hardworking American who pays his taxes, and the last thing I need is some guy on the street demanding change from me,” said William Overkamp, a Springfield, IL gun-shop owner.

He added, “What he really needs is a job.”

Francis L. Holland Blog said...

AAPP: I think it's important that Blacks know McCain's color-aroused antagonist record, so that we'll fight against him determinedly.

However, I don't think we should highlight this in our message to whites, because Ronald Reagan got elected BECAUSE he held views similar to those reflected in McCain's voting record. Ronald Reagan rounded up whites by appealing to their color-aroused ideation and emotion about Blacks, in order to elicit color-aroused voting behavior.

I'm concerned that if we tell whites all of the terrible things that McCain has voted for against Blacks, this will actually strengthen his position with the color-aroused antagonists within his own Party, as well as the Reagan Democrats and independents who still harbor latent color-aroused ideation and emotion.

Of course this is just a theory. The other possibility is that people are sick and tired of politicians like Hillary Clinton and John McCain trying to manipulate them with color-arousal cues. Maybe that explains why all-white states and Republican states are voting for Barack Obama.

AAPP said...

Thanks Ms. Lady, I love political humor too. It looks like someone left some bigoted political humor in the comments section. I try not to delete comments even if they are spam comments. I notice the same comments at African American Opinion blog. The widget yo see is a going up and down the blog is a new widget that allows people to talk with each other on the blog when they visit. I'm just trying it out.

Thanks for the comments as usual. Can't wait for you to join the afrospear.

Peace and blessings.

AAPP

Anonymous said...

I know that McCain will not wrest the black vote away from Obama but it is important for blacks to be very carefule about painting McCain as racist.

Obama and McCain will be fighting over the highly coveted 'white moderate vote' and Obama has promised to win their votes by changing the tone of political debate and promising 'unity.'

White moderates will be looking to see if Dems use race-baiting tactics(seeing racism where none exists)and perpetuate the meme that 'all Republicans are racist.'

I do not ascribe to the viewpoint that 'most people are racist.'

If Obama supporters choose to attack McCain as racist, a great deal of his moderate white supporters will abandon him.

In just this past week Obama supporter Jill Tubman at jackandjillpolitics.blogspot.com
call McCain 'racist' and 'Archie Bunker.' She also use race-baiting tactics by referencing that the image of the black man holding McCain's umbrella was 'inappropriate and servile.'

This race-baiting tactic has also been expressed on the Huffington Post.

Obama supporters will be held to the same standards of political discourse and debate as their candidate, and he to theirs.

Be careful. Undecided white moderates will be watching to see how the 'race card' will be played.